Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Hadith Qudsi

http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2011/11/29/what-is-the-difference-between-a-regular-hadith-and-a-hadith-qudsi/
Question: Assalamualaikum,
I never understood the nature of Hadith Qudsi and how it was different from the “regular” hadiths. Also, the “regular” hadiths are ‘traditions’ and narrations of the Prophet (peace be upon him) doing, saying, and instructing us to do many things. How did the Prophet (peace be upon him) receive this information from Allah relative to Qur’anic revelation and the Hadith Qudsi?
Answer: Wa alaikum assalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh,
I hope you are in the best of health and spirits, insha’Allah.
A Sacred Narration (al-Hadith al-Qudsi) is a narration (hadith) which, from the perspective of its meaning, is from Allah, the Exalted, and from the perspective of its wording, from the Messenger of God (Allah bless him and give him peace). [Jurjani, al-Ta`rifat]
The Difference between the Regular Narrations (Hadith) and the Sacred Narrations (al-Hadith al-Qudsi)
The Sacred Narration (al-Hadith al-Qudsi) is attributed to Allah, Most High, and related from Him. The Messenger of God (Allah bless him and give him peace) would receive the meaning from Allah, by way of inspiration or dream, and then he (Allah bless him and give him peace) would inform his community of this in his own words.
This is contrary to the remaining narrations (hadith) as the Messenger of God (Allah bless him and give him peace) would not attribute them to His Lord, nor relate them from Him.
The Difference between the Sacred Narrations (al-Hadith al-Qudsi) and the Qur’an
There are many differences between the Qur’an and the Sacred Narration (al-Hadith al-Qudsi). Of the most notable of them are the facts that the Qur’an is miraculous in its wording and was revealed by the intermediary of the Angel Gabriel. A Sacred Narration (al-Hadith al-Qudsi), on the other hand, has neither of these qualities.
Other unique qualities which the Qur’an, alone, possesses are:
[1] The mass transmission (mutawatir) in all of its words and letters;
[2] The impermissibility of touching the Qur’an for the one in a state of minor ritual impurity (and reciting it for the one in a state of major ritual impurity);
[3] The requirement, and specification, of its recital in the prayer;
[4] It is called the Qur’an;
[5] It is an act of worship to recite the Qur’an and one is rewarded for each letter;
The Qur’an’s words, and meanings, are from Allah through manifest revelation; contrary to the narrations (hadith).
[`Ayni, `Umdat al-Qari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari; Siraj al-Din, Sharh al-Mandhuma al-Bayquniyya; al-Sayyid Muhammad bin `Alawi, al-Manhal al-Latif fi Usul al-Hadith al-Sharif]
This is something of what can be said about the difference between the
Sacred Narration (al-Hadith al-Qudsi) and the Qur’an.
And Allah knows best.
Wassalam,
Tabraze Azam
Checked & Approved by Faraz Rabbani


http://www.muftisays.com/blog/Seifeddine-M/3757_22-10-2014/hadith-qudsi.html
Qudsi hadith are those hadith that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم related from Allah سبحانه و تعالى. Mullah Ali al-Qaari رحمه الله has given the following excellent definition for hadith qudsi. He wrote, "It is that which is related by the foremost of relaters and the most reliable of authorities, the best of blessings and salutations be upon him, from Allah, may He be glorified, sometimes through the medium of Gabriel, upon whom be blessings and peace, and sometimes by revelation, inspiration and dreams. Allah having entrusted to him the expressing of it in such words as he wished. It differs from the Quran in that the revelation of the latter was only through the medium of the Upright Soul [Gabriel] and is restricted to the wording specifically revealed from the Preserved Tablet." [1]

Such hadith usually take one of the following forms:

(1) Some begin with, "The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم says from among the sayings he related from his Lord..."

(2) Sometimes they begin with, "Allah the Almighty has said, from among the sayings related from Him by the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم ... "

(3) Or, "The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said that Allah سبحانه و تعالى has said..."

(4) The words of Allah سبحانه و تعالى may be referred to as written instead of spoken.

(5) Sometimes the words from Allah سبحانه و تعالى are between or introduced by a statement of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم.

(6) And, finally, an indirect but clear reference may be made to a statement of Allah سبحانه و تعالى in the words of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم.

The Customarily Given Differences Between Qudsi Hadeeth and the Qur'aan

One might ask what the differences between a qudsi hadith and the Quran are. Al-Qattaan رحمه الله has noted what is commonly considered the five differences between the two. They are:

(1) The Quran was revealed by Allah سبحانه و تعالى in both meaning and wording through the angel Gabriel عليه السلام to the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. It was not received through any form of inspiration, such as a dream, vision and so forth. Hadith qudsi, on the other hand, may be received through any of those means.

(2) The Quran was established as a miracle and a challenge to all of mankind until the Day of Judgment. Hadith qudsi are not considered miraculous as such and are not a challenge to mankind.

(3) The Quran is only stated or related with reference to Allah سبحانه و تعالى. One can only say, for example, "Allah says in the Quran..." Hadith qudsi, on the other hand, are reports narrated by the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم and, hence, are related from him from Allah سبحانه و تعالى.

(4) All of the Quran is mutawaatir and qati 'ee ath-thaboot. [2] The majority of the qudsi hadith do not meet the standards of mutawaatir. They are, therefore, subject to the rules and grading of hadith. Some such hadith are sahih, some are hasan, some are weak and others are fabricated.

(5) With respect to the Quran, both the wording and the meaning were revealed to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم from Allah. With respect to hadith qudsi, only the meaning was revealed to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم while the wording came from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم himself. Therefore, it is allowed to narrate qudsi hadith according to their meanings only (for those who allow narration of hadith according to their meanings) but this is not allowed for the Quran.

(6) Finally, only the Quran is allowed for the recitation in the prayer. Furthermore, the one who recites it will receive ten rewards for each letter of the Quran that he recites. Hadith qudsi may not be recited as part of the prayer nor is there any special reward for reciting hadith qudsi. [3]


Critique of the Customary Approach


There does not seem to be any room for dispute concerning (1), (2) (3) and (6) above. However, (4) and (5) need some clarification or comment. It is not correct to say that one of the differences between qudsi hadith and the Quran is that all of the Quran is mutawaatir while qudsi hadith may be sahih, hasan, weak and so forth. Many scholars state that the conditions for a narration to be considered part of the Quran are three:

(a) it must be mutawaatir,

(b) it must be consistent with at least one of the copies of the Quran that Uthman رضي الله عنه distributed throughout the Muslims lands, and

(c) it must be consistent with the Arabic language.

However, if (a) is met, the other two conditions become redundant or superfluous. By definition, (a) implies that the report is such that it cannot be questioned or doubted. Hence, what is the need for the other two conditions? Some specialists in Quranic recitation state that the first condition is not that of being mutawaatir but only that the chain must be sahih. [4]

Indeed, an-Namlah states what the scholars mean when they that the recital be mutawaatir is simply that it has an authentic chain back to the Prophet (may Allah exalt his mention and grant him peace), [5] and not the usage of the term mutawaatir according to the scholars of hadith. In this way, the other two conditions become meaningful because they ensure that, although the chain might be sahih, that no mistake has been made in the transmission of the recitation.

Furthermore, there are recitations of the Quran that are considered rejected or shaadh ("irregular"), since they do not meet the conditions stated above for the Quran. This is no different from saying that there are qudsi hadith that are weak or rejected. Hence, (3) above cannot be considered a true difference between the Quran and qudsi hadith.

Finally, if one is talking about the essential difference between the Quran and qudsi hadith, it is irrelevant to discuss whether one is mutawaatir and the other is not. Obviously, the essential differences between them existed at the time of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم when the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم himself narrated these statements. At that time, there was no concept of mutawaatir and the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم would sometimes send individual teachers to specific tribes to teach the Quran. Hence, the question of mutawaatir is completely irrelevant to the issue of the difference in nature between qudsi hadith and the Quran.

There is also a difference of opinion concerning the wording of qudsi hadith. Does that wording come from Allah سبحانه و تعالى or does it come from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم? As stated above in (4), al-Qattaan is of the view that its wording is from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. As-Sabbaagh is also of this opinion. He states that if the wording and meaning were both from Allah سبحانه و تعالى, then, from the shareeah point of view, it should be given the same status as the Quran. He claims that there would then be no reason to distinguish between the two wordings from Allah سبحانه و تعالى. He then argues that if that were the case, it would not be allowed to narrate a qudsi hadith according to its meaning (which the scholars say is acceptable). He also states that then it could be used in worship like the Quran, but no scholar says that.

As-Sabbaagh then poses the following question, "If the wording is not from Allah سبحانه و تعالى, why is the quote attributed to Allah?" As-Sabbaagh states that this is not problematic and is common in the Arabic language. It implies that what the quotation contains of meaning is from Allah سبحانه و تعالى and not that the exact words are from Allah سبحانه و تعالى. He argues that this is similar to Allah سبحانه و تعالى quoting the previous prophets in the Quran and saying, for example, "Moses said," while, in fact, Moses عليه السلام did not speak Arabic and those are not his exact words. [6]

Those quotes only contain the meaning of what Moses عليه السلام said. As-Sabbaagh then quotes Mustafa az-Zarqa as saying that qudsi hadith are like giving a person a text to translate. The translated text is still ascribed to the original speaker although the wording is not his. [7]

But that inevitably leads to the following question: If qudsi hadith are simply inspired by Allah سبحانه و تعالى and in the Prophet's صلى الله عليه وسلم wording, what is the difference then between qudsi hadith and the remainder of the Prophet's صلى الله عليه وسلم speech which was also inspired by Allah سبحانه و تعالى? The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم stated, "Certainly, I have been given the Book and what is similar to it with it." [8]

Furthermore, there are numerous verses in the Quran to the effect of the following verses,



"And Allaah has sent down to you the Book (The Qur'aan), and Al-Hikmah (the Sunnah), and taught you that which you knew not. And Ever Great is the Grace of Allaah unto you (O Muhammad, peace be upon him)." (Sooratun Nisaa', 4:113)



"He it is Who sent among the unlettered ones a Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) from among themselves, reciting to them His Verses, purifying them, and teaching them the Book (the Qur'aan), and Al-Hikmah [9] (the Sunnah). And verily, they had been before in manifest error." (Sooratul Jumu'ah, 62:2)

Allah سبحانه و تعالى also says,



"And remember (O you the members of the Prophet's family عليهم الصلاة والسلام), that which is recited in your houses of the Verses of Allaah and Al-Hikmah (the Sunnah). Verily, Allah is Ever Most Courteous, Well-Acquainted with all things." (Sooratul Ahzaab, 33:34) [10]

Commenting on verses of this nature, Imaam ash-Shafi'ee رحمه الله stated, "I have heard from those with whom I am pleased of the people of knowledge of the Quran who said that the Hikmah is the sunnah of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم. This is the most likely opinion, Allah knows best. This is because the Quran has been mentioned and is followed by mention of the Hikmah. Allah also mentioned His bounties upon His creation by their being taught the Book and Hikmah. Therefore, it is not allowed, Allah knows best, to call the Hikmah here anything other than the sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (may Allah exalt his mention and grant him peace)." [11]

In other words, the sunnah as a whole is considered a form of "inspiration" from Allah سبحانه و تعالى but in the wording of the Prophet (may Allah exalt his mention and grant him peace). [12]

What then would distinguish qudsi hadith from other hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم if the inspiration in both cases is from Allah سبحانه و تعالى and the wording from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم? In this case, also, there is no need for the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to state, "Allah said," when, in fact, the words did not come from Allah سبحانه و تعالى.

Perhaps, this is an issue that cannot be resolved based on the information available. There is no strong evidence to definitively conclude that the wording of qudsi hadith comes from either Allah سبحانه و تعالى or the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. Personally, this author leans toward the view that the wording comes directly from Allah سبحانه و تعالى.

The important point is that such qudsi hadith are known not to be part of the Quran. This is known from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم himself. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم would distinguish between the Quran and qudsi hadith. Whenever a verse of the Quran was revealed to him, he would call one of his scribes--and he had specific scribes for the recording of the Quran, such as Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, Zaid ibn Thaabit and others رضي الله عنهم. He would then tell the scribe to place that newly revealed verse in surah such and such. [13]

Furthermore, the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم never recited qudsi hadith in the prayers nor did he read them back to the Angel Gabriel عليه السلام when going over the Quran.

The important matter, then, is that the qudsi hadith were distinguished from the Quran by the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم himself. This is how it is known that such statements from Allah سبحانه و تعالى do not form part of the Quran. However, this in itself does not rule out the possibility that the wording of qudsi hadith are from Allah. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم narrated them as Allah's words and this is probably the strongest indication concerning this matter. This implies that they are words from Allah سبحانه و تعالى but it was made clear to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم that they did not form part of the Quran. This direct inspiration of wording is what distinguishes them from the remainder of the statements of the Prophet (peace be upon him). [14]

http://darulfiqh.com/what-are-the-differences-between-the-quran-and-a-hadith-qudsi/
Question:
What are the differences between the Qur’an and a Hadith Qudsi?
Answer:
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.
The Ulama have mentioned many distinctions between the Qur’ān and the Ahādīth Qudsīyyah.[1]  Below are a few: 
1)    The words and the meanings of the Qur’an are from Allah Ta’ālā.  Whereas a Hadīth Qudsī does not necessarily contain the exact words of Allah Ta’ālā. 
2)    The whole Qur’ān is decisive and definite in its transmission.  It is mutawātir.  Many of the Ahādīth Qudsīyyah are not mutawātir.  The authenticity will have to be analysed for each hadīth.
3)    The Qur’ān is a miracle and a challenge.  Allah Ta’ālā challenges us to bring a single verse similar to the verses of the Qur’ān.  The Ahādīth Qudsīyyah do not have such a level of miraculousness and challenge.
4)    The recitation of the Qur’ān has quantified virtues and rewards.  Recitation is worship in itself.  Whereas, the recitation of Ahādīth Qudsīyyah although they are means of immense barakah (blessings), do not have any specific quantified virtue or reward attributed to them.  The recitation of Ahādīth Qudsīyyah is not worship in the strict sense and meaning of worship.  
The above contrasts and differences result in the following rulings:
1)    Only the Qur’ān can be recited in salāh and not the Ahādīth Qudsīyyah.
2)    The Qur’ān cannot be narrated or recited in one’s own meaning.  The Ahādīth may be narrated in words similar to the meaning of the actual wording for those who have profound mastery in the Arabic language.
3)    It is not permissible for a person without wudhū’ to touch the Qur’ān and nor can a person in the state of major impurity recite the Qur’ān.  In contrast, a person without wudhū’ may touch the books and writings of the Ahādīth Qudsīyyah.  Likewise, a person in the state of major impurity requiring a ghusl (bath) may recite the Ahādīth Qudsīyyah.  However, to do so is discouraged and against the sanctity of the Ahādīth.
4)    A person can lose his Imān by rejecting a word of the Qur’ān.  This is not true for the Ahādīth Qudsīyyahwhich are not mutawātir in transmission. 
And Allah Ta’ālā Knows Best
Mufti Faraz al-Mahmudi, 
Darul Iftaa
Dublin, Irelandwww.darulfiqh.com

No comments:

Post a Comment